What Is Judiciary Branch In The Philippines?

Author

Author: Artie
Published: 19 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court of the Philippines

The Supreme Court of the Philippines is established in the Constitution, and three levels of lower courts are also established through law. The Supreme Court has wide-ranging powers, including the ability to overrule political and administrative decisions. The rules of procedure for lower courts are determined by it.

The Supreme Court of Appeals

The Supreme Court is made up of a chief Justice and 14 associate justices who serve until the age of 70. The court can sit in one of the three divisions. The Judicial and Bar Council submitted a list of candidates for the chief justice and associate justices.

The president has 90 days to fill the vacant position. A new process of selecting a chief magistrate was created after the revolution of 1986. Roberto V. Concepcion was a delegate of the Constitutional Commission.

The goal of the Council is to diminish the power of the president in appointing judges. The Office of the Ombudsman, the appointment of chief justices, and members of the judiciary can be read here. The Court of Appeals is the second highest tribunal in the country and was established in 1936.

The current form of the Court of Appeals was formed through Batas Pambansa Blg. Executive Order No. 33, s. 1986, amended the Republic Act No. 7902 and Republic Act No. Private individuals who are charged with co-principals, accessories or other related offenses with the public officers or employees, including those employed in govemment-owned or controlled corporations, will be tried together with them in the proper courts.

The judiciary: a challenge facing the digital age

The members of the Supreme Court and the judges of lower courts are required to be in good behavior until they reach 70 years old. The Supreme Court has the authority to discipline judges of lower courts. The judges of lower courts could be dismissed by a majority of the members who took part in the deliberations on the issues of the case.

The independence of the judiciary is threatened by political patronage and interference. The creation of a strong, a political judiciary is more important than the consolidation of democratic institutions. The justice system and the judiciary are important areas in which trust in the public is low.

The judiciary of Mindanao

The courts can be considered independent if they are not involved in politics and can act as neutral arbiters of conflict between the state and the people. The high court affirmed the applications by the administration to extend martial law beyond the sixty-day maximum. Martial law is still in effect in the state of Mindanao.

The Supreme Court is only one check on presidential power. Civil society groups can demand accountability from the president in many other ways, even though the current administration-controlled Congress cannot act as an effective counterbalance to the executive branch. The people are the final judges of their rulers.

The judiciary alone is not enough for the defense of democracy. It is just one piece of the puzzle. The people have the ability to choose their representatives, and to participate in decisions made by their government.

The Case of the Judiciary

There is a constant discussion of corruption. The legal and judicial system is supposed to be the most important defense and the system has failed. The people have no control over the Judiciary. The people of the Judiciary are not given any input into the Judiciary.

Click Penguin

X Cancel
No comment yet.